PRESS DISPUTE RESOLUTION: METODOLOGI RESOLUSI KONFLIK BERBASIS MEDIA

نویسندگان

چکیده

Islam has been known as a religion of Rahmatn lil’alamiin which guarantees inclusion and maintains treatise on all humanity. However, the interpretation universality does not meet common understanding even though within Muslim community itself. Those diverse interpretations have resulted in how expressed. One those quarrels toward is discussion Nusantara. West Sumatera one regions Indonesia implements Islamic law its customary rejection against Nusantara echoed across borders. The caused reactions from various parties since strongly stated way for preserving it. dispute sharpened by online news several Indonesian media that began to raise phenomenon up. This research aim find out medias frame whether contribute minimizing public tensions. used descriptive method with qualitative approach. source data focused 2018 was analyzed framing analysis Robert N. Entman also using concept treatment recommendation an analyzes resolution. results discovered technique their own moral judgement form resolution towards discourses media. judgment can show tendency alignment regarding issue. In addition, important role developing audience’s mindset midst it be based resolution.
 
 merupakan agama rahmatan lil ‘alamiin dan bersifat universal serta hadir sebagai sebuah risalah seluruh umat manusia. Akan tetapi, pemaknaan terhadap universalitas tidak seragam terlebih pemaknaannya bagi kalangan itu sendiri. Hal ini menimbulkan banyak interpetasi yang bermacam-macam untuk mengekspresikan ini. Salah satu bentuk interpretasi adalah munculnya istilah kembali menuai perdebatan. Barat salah wilayah di dengan hukum adatnya sangat kuat menolak pengistilahan Penolakan reaksi dari beberbagai pihak. dikarenakan, menjaga kelestarian budayanya wacana memiliki visi samaseperti dimiliki Barat. Arena pertarungan diperluas oleh adanya pemberitaan media-media mulai mengangkat fenomena Penelitian dilakukan menemukan bagaimana membingkai apakah juga peran meminimalisasi ketegangan terjadi antara pihak bertikai. Metode digunakan metode deskriptif pendekatan kualitatif. Sumber diperoleh mengacu pada mainstream tahun dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis model Hasil penelitan mengungkapkan bahwa dalam pembingkaian berita, judgement-nya masing-masing. Moral Judgement dapat memperlihatkan arah atau keberpihakan suatu isu. Selain itu, peranan penting mendewasakan khalayak tengah konflik. terlihat berbasis

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Dispute prevention and dispute resolution in networked health information technology

The United States has committed to promote Health Information Technology through Electronic Health Records that will be exchanged among participants in the healthcare enterprise. In anticipation of problems, legal remedies have been established to protect the rights of all participants, especially their rights to protect the privacy of their own information. However, there are certain to be sit...

متن کامل

Alternative dispute resolution and mediation.

Doctors and patients are not natural enemies. On the contrary, there is commonly a special relationship between them, with vulnerability and trust on one side and caring and professional expertise on the other. A medical dispute can create turmoil of that relationship, particularly if it is conducted in the traditional adversarial procedure. Depending on how it develops, the patient may see the...

متن کامل

Dispute Resolution for gTLD Conflicts

Efficient and equitable dispute resolution is key to avoiding systemic disturbance in the use and valorization of top level domain names (TLDs). Such dispute resolution is also important given the increasing number of clashes between TLD providers and managers and between trademark owners and generic (gTLD)-related registrants. ICANN policies/rules form the basis of gTLD-related second level do...

متن کامل

Dispute Resolution Institutions and Strategic Militarization

A central question in political science is how to best manage information asymmetries and commitment problems when disputes arise between states. We argue that existing work miss an important feature: dispute settlement institutions shape the incentives for entering disputes. Because war is the down-side risk from entering a dispute, institutions that reduce the chances of war-fighting may incr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Tajdid: jurnal ilmu ushuluddin

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2502-3063', '2541-5018']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v20i1.156